From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 11 Aug 93 20:46:01 GMT
From: cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!news@ucbvax
.Berkeley.EDU  (Dave Griffith)
Subject: Re: Ada and C++: A request for comparison/contrast/relative benefits
Message-ID: <1993Aug11.204601.23407@midway.uchicago.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <24bjko$obe@truffula.fp.trw.com> erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry  
Erwin) writes:
> Would someone kindly explain to me why the Ada proponents assumed I was
> bashing Ada, while the Ada opponents assumed I was bashing the
> alternative? Are things -->that<-- polarized? 
> 

Large-scale impending budget cuts will do that to a viewpoint...

--
Dave Griffith, Information Resources, University of Chicago,
Biological Sciences Division               dave@delphi.bsd.uchicago.edu
"The faults in bad software can be so subtle as to be practically theological"
--Bruce Sterling