From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 9 Aug 93 13:45:33 GMT
From: agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!source.asset.com!theeke@ucbvax.Berkele
y.EDU  (Patrick A. Theeke)
Subject: Re: Ada and C++: A request for comparison/contrast/relative benifits
Message-ID: <1993Aug09.134533.15532@source.asset.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Aug6.203641.12218@newshost.lanl.gov> hines@paloverde.lanl.gov w
rites:
>
>Hello folks,
>
>N O   L A N G U A G E   W A R S ,   P L E A S E ! ! !
>
>Really, I'm serious. This is a simple request for information. I am personally
>an Ada fan, if you must know, but have been asked by a superior to provide som
e
>information.
								   
I'll post this, since I need help resolving the exact reference. 

In a previous life I remembered seeing a book-sized report that might help.
I made a call and got some more info, but can't tell you where to get a copy 
or if an update exists. All the info I have follows:

	Ada & C++: Business Case Analysis
	July 1991
	Produced by: Deputy Assistant of the USAF: Communications, Computers, a
nd 
		Logistics

I can tell you that the conclusion was that their is no reason why C++ should
be used over Ada. NO FLAMES PLEASE, I am just the messenger. Read the report
and draw your own conclusions! My opinion on the results I keep to myself for
religious reasons...

Good luck, hope this helps.

--
       |
     _/|__  _    Patrick A. Theeke                     theeke@source.ASSET.com
   _/   * |/_\   Senior Software Engineer
  /       _/     SAIC/Asset Source for Software Engineering Technology (ASSET)
 (       /       2611 Cranberry Square                 VOICE:  (304) 594-1762
  \____/         Morgantown, WV  26505                 FAX:    (304) 594-3951