From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a7324909b7c97b68 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-04-05 14:36:52 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: gmd.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen.apl.jhu.edu!ddsdx2.jhuapl.edu!dlc From: dlc@ddsdx2.jhuapl.edu (Dave Collard x7468) Subject: Re: Ada9X boycott of OBJECT EXPO (NY, Apr): Why? Message-ID: <1993Apr5.202604.1636@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> Sender: news@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Johns Hopkins University References: <408@fedfil.UUCP> <1993Apr2.134403.24908@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Mon, 5 Apr 93 20:26:04 GMT Date: 1993-04-05T20:26:04+00:00 List-Id: In srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes: >>>* Once again, there is virtually no Ada9X representation at the talks or >>>*the trade show. Here are people currently making Object Oriented decisions >>>*for the companies, prime candidates for a pitch on Ada9X, and there is no >>>*one their to sell them on Ada9X. >>On page 8 of my brochure, session T14 Edmond Schonberg is >>talking about Ada9x: Objectifying the Ada Language. >>So you must have missed it. See you there. > If you had bothered to read my original posting, you would have >>[computer-generated drivel deleted] > If the implications of the pathetic state of Ada outside the Mandated >world on national security and the DoD's ability to develop software in >an era of decreasing budgets is drivel, I stand (or sit) so informed. The deleted remarks were Ted Holden's, not yours, so unless you want to take credit for them... --Thor dlc@ddsdx2.jhuapl.edu