From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 1 Oct 92 07:17:57 GMT
From: mcsun!sunic!lth.se!newsuser@uunet.uu.net  (Dag Bruck)
Subject: Re: Ada's (in)visibility
Message-ID: <1992Oct1.071757.21801@lth.se>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <comp.lang.ada> emery@Dr_No.mitre.org (David Emery) writes:
>
>The real solution for Ada and X Windows will occur when X Windows is
>multi-threaded in a way that meshes with Ada tasks.  

My _guess_ is that X will be compatible with POSIX threads, if X ever
gets threaded.  The question then is how compatible POSIX threads and
Ada tasks are...