From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 5 Nov 92 13:56:15 GMT From: cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu !mars.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu!larry@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Larry Maturo) Subject: Re: Who uses Ada?? Message-ID: <1992Nov5.135615.390@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu> List-Id: In article <1992Nov5.015812.17210@fcom.cc.utah.edu> val@news.ccutah.edu (Val Ka rtchner) writes: >larry@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Larry Maturo) writes: >: You left out the important and growing group of those who must use Ada and >: after having had to use would not switch even if they could. Try it, >: you'll like it. > >I've tried it. (Assuming you call >28KSLOC/yr trying.) I don't like it. >I prefer to use the right tool for the job. If that's Ada, then I'll >use that. However, many people only know one language and assume that >that language is best for everything. > >I consider it telling that it is endorsed (by mandate) by an organization >which can't balance it's collective checkbook (and many individual ones). >-- >|== with disclaimer; use disclaimer; == val@csulx.weber.edu ==///============= | >| "Ada and C++: A Business Case Analysis" -- Air Force Study /// Weber State | >| "And what would you like this study to conclude, sir?" \\\/// University | >|========== -- Mr. Richfield, "Dinosaurs" ================\///= Ogden UT USA = | As I said in an earlier post I think it's silly to only know and/or use one language. Languages are tools, one size does not fit all. On the other hand, I find it hard to believe that there are people who don't find Ada the right tool for any job. I suspect the problem is with them more than with Ada. Heck , I've even found problems best solved by assembly language at times. And of course, whatever language is the right tool for the job you should like while you are doing that job since if it's the right tool it's saving you time and/or effort better spent else where. +-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ | | | | Larry Maturo | Opinions expressed herein must be | | Tactical Simulation Division | yours, neither I nor my employer have | | Applied Research Laboratories | any. | | University of Texas at Austin | | | P.O. Box 8029 +----------------------------------------+ | Austin, Texas 78713-8029 | | | | When you're as great as I am it's hard | | larry@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu | to be modest, but I succeed where | | | others fail. | +-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+