From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,SYSADMIN
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 11 Nov 92 14:28:08 GMT
From: mcsun!uknet!gdt!aber!btk@uunet.uu.net  (Benjamin Thomas Ketteridge)
Subject: Re: More Ashamedness of Ada - this time OBJECT WORLD
Message-ID: <1992Nov11.142808.17224@aber.ac.uk>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

from message by jessop@ljohub.enet.dec.com (Class Dinosauria):
> Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

   .. stuff deleted ..

> DEC makes THE best Ada compiler and library system (as far as I'm concerned).

Isn't it rather obvious that the author of this message is likely to support
DEC Ada, (I wonder his boss reads comp.lang.ada :-) :-) )

But seriously: I would agree that the DEC Ada compiler is pretty good - I use i
t
every day. I would prefer to use the Alsys Ada compiler, but that is no longer
supported by our local support team :-( the DEC Ada compile-time messages are
very good, but it suffers from C-like run-time error-messages (this is not
surprising since the main program of DEC Ada programs is actually in C!)

The DEC Ada libraries are good, tho' I haven't tried using the X binding yet.

ciao
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|    _|--|_    | Disclaimer: I know nothing! Do you really know anything?  |
|     (\/)     +-------------------------------+---------------------------+
|      vv      | We've a Gremlin in the works! |      btk@aber.ac.uk       |
+--------------+-------------------------------+---------------------------+