From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 24 Mar 92 18:54:01 GMT
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ennews!enuxha.ea
s.asu.edu!koehnema@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: Why ADA?
Message-ID: <1992Mar24.185401.13613@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <92084.001321HOLNESSI@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> HOLNESSI@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (I
ain D. Holness) writes:
>  BUT, on the flip side, it is
>  causing an evolution in my programming style and those of my two
>  partners, because we are more sensitive to what is proper and correct.

Many people have said that the gains we will see in our migration to
Ada will not come from the language itself.  Rather they will come from
the exposure to basic SE principles that will take place when learning
the Ada language, even if not from formal instruction.  It is interesting
to see an example of this.  I'd bet your C programs would look quite a
bit different now compared to C programs you had written before this
understanding.
--
Harry Koehnemann
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu