From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 2 Jan 92 20:03:17 GMT
From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero.org!jordan@decwrl.dec.com  (Larry M. Jordan)
Subject: Re: Multiple Inheritance
Message-ID: <1992Jan2.200317.27856@aero.org>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Guido van Rossum writes:

>...However, I'm still worried about MI.  When MI is *not* used,
>it still imposes an overhead--there is a "delta" offset in the
>vtbl that is added to "this" each time a virtual function is called...

I own the Zortech C++ compiler and the documentation for it clearly
indicates there is *no* additional overhead if MI is *not* used.

Someone at Zortech want to confirm this?  

--Larry