From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 7 Dec 92 21:16:50 GMT
From: cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!jldh@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Jorge Luis
 Diaz-Herrera)
Subject: Re: C++ vs. Ada -- Is Ada loosing?
Message-ID: <1992Dec7.161650.29381@sei.cmu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1992Dec4.141816.1@happy.colorado.edu>, srheintze@happy.colorado.edu
 writes:
|> 
|> HOWEVER, please read "A dynamic Vector is harder than it looks" from the Jun
e
|> 1992 is issue of JOOP (Journal of Object Oriented Programming) - vol 5 no 4.
 
|> *THIS ARTICLE IS SCARY*  Basically Tom Cargill pointed out a bug that nearly
|> all C++ textbooks have made when they implement a dynamically sized array. 
|> This includes the textbook written by the implementor of the AT&T Cfront
|> compiler (will I get in trouble if I mention his name?).  If the language is
 so
|> convoluted that even the experts (including the compiler writers) cannot get
|> their simple textbook examples correct, then I conclude there is something
|> drastically wrong with the language.
|> ...
|> 			Thanks,
|> 				Sieg

I could not find this article! The June issue is volume 3 (not there) and
vlume 4 is July/August (not there!!)

jld-h
--..--