From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!weyrich!orville
From: orville@weyrich.UUCP (Orville R. Weyrich)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Patriot problem, more info available?
Message-ID: <1991Jun7.160927.1667@weyrich.UUCP>
Date: 7 Jun 91 16:09:27 GMT
References: <9106070033.AA16103@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> <1991Jun7.080445.12661@netcom.COM>
Reply-To: orville@weyrich.UUCP (Orville R. Weyrich)
Organization: Weyrich Computer Consulting
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1991Jun7.080445.12661@netcom.COM> jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter) writes:
>>I am particularly interested in the connection
>>between four days of operation and a software failure.
>>Based on no more than the newspaper article I wonder
>>if a dynamic memory got fragmented and slow with time.
>
>That's certainly how it reads. I've been told by people
>involved with the project that the system is programmed in a
>mixture of assembly, FORTRAN, and JOVIAL--but from the way it
>failed it sounds more like LISP!

Hmmm ... reminds me of an article that I saw describing a program which
converts LISP into FORTRAN.  It could be a LISP interpreter implemented
in FORTRAN :-).

--------------------------------------           ******************************
Orville R. Weyrich, Jr., Ph.D.                   Certified Systems Professional
Internet: orville%weyrich@uunet.uu.net             Weyrich Computer Consulting
Voice:    (602) 391-0821                         POB 5782, Scottsdale, AZ 85261
Fax:      (602) 391-0023                              (Yes! I'm available)
--------------------------------------           ******************************