From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!cse!texas!csl.dl.nec.com!baker From: baker@csl.dl.nec.com (Larry Baker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OOP and large systems. Message-ID: <1991Jun6.140029.27930@csl.dl.nec.com> Date: 6 Jun 91 14:00:29 GMT References: <1991Jun5.210123.28235@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: news@csl.dl.nec.com (CCSL News--cjk) Organization: NEC America, C & C Software Development Laboratory Nntp-Posting-Host: texas.csl.dl.nec.com List-Id: larryc@puente.jpl.nasa.gov (Larry Carroll) writes: |> The most impressive aspect of C++, as reported by a group of programmers |> (most of them Fortran & C users) here who were forced to learn & use it for a |> task last year, was inheritance. With careful attention to design, they |> were able to re-use a lot of their own code, & re-design it quickly when |> needed. We use C++, and there are several people here (myself included) with Ada backgrounds, who would add to the above observation: Dynamic Binding has, for us, been a very significant added benefit. The combination of DB and Inheritance is a very, very powerful mechanism. -- Larry Baker NEC America C&C Software Laboratories, Irving (near Dallas), TX baker@csl.dl.nec.com cs.utexas.edu!necssd!baker