From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada, comp.realtime
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!klemmer!vestal
From: vestal@SRC.Honeywell.COM (Steve Vestal)
Subject: security
Message-ID: <1991Jun4.215800.25505@src.honeywell.com>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.com (News interface)
Nntp-Posting-Host: klemmer.src.honeywell.com
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 91 21:58:00 GMT
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I would appreciate receiving pointers to any (proposed) standards, surveys, or
"typical" requirements for security in embedded systems.  I'm not talking
about Orange book type stuff, but rather about compartmentalized or red/black
security requirements that might be imposed on embedded systems.  Thanks in
advance.

Steve Vestal
Mail: Honeywell S&RC MN65-2100, 3660 Technology Drive, Minneapolis MN 55418 
Phone: (612) 782-7049                    Internet: vestal@src.honeywell.com