From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jpl-devvax!poe!larryc
From: larryc@poe.jpl.nasa.gov (Larry Carroll)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How Ada is failing socially
Message-ID: <1991Jun25.012922.17113@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: 25 Jun 91 01:29:22 GMT
Sender: usenet@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (For NNTP so rrn will be able to post)
Distribution: comp.lang.ada
Organization: Jet Propulsion Lab, AEG/FIST
Nntp-Posting-Host: poe
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ada is failing (or not succeeding as fast as some other languages) because
compilers for it are much more expensive than those for other languages.  C
(& now C++) is so popular because C compilers were free or inexpensive during
the last half of the 70's & most of the 80's.  The same has been true of C++
-> C interpreters & now C++ compilers for the last few years.