From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:5811 comp.lang.c++:14343 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!jls From: jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter) Subject: Re: c++ vs ada results Message-ID: <1991Jun24.201111.13742@netcom.COM> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest} References: <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <1991Jun16.041037.11606@kithrup.COM> <1991Jun18.041751.3740@netcom.COM> <1991Jun23.235958.14705@grebyn.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1991 20:11:11 GMT List-Id: >Second, the learning curve to go from c to >c++ is much shorter and easier than that for COBOL, Fortran, etc. to >Ada. A much more valid comparison, I think, would be the learning curve to go from C to C++ vs the learning curve to go from Pascal to Ada. -- *** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 **** *Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects* *of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/* *reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++. *