From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:5798 comp.lang.c++:14319
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!pyrdc!grebyn!cbw
From: cbw@grebyn.com (CBW Consulting)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: c++ vs ada results
Message-ID: <1991Jun23.235958.14705@grebyn.com>
Date: 23 Jun 91 23:59:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: grebyn.1991Jun23.235958.14705
References: <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <1991Jun16.041037.11606@kithrup.COM> <1991Jun18.041751.3740@netcom.COM>
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Those of you who missed Don Reifer's presentation at WAdaS last week
should be sure to try and get a copy of his report.

It shows that c++ is cheaper than Ada.  There are a few other factors
that need to be examined.  First the results of the study are derrived
from a small number of c++ project and most of them are in the
telecommunications domain.  Second, the learning curve to go from c to
c++ is much shorter and easier than that for COBOL, Fortran, etc. to
Ada.

Chuck Williams
CBW Consulting