From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:5786 comp.lang.c++:14311
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!jls
From: jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: chief programmer team organizations was (c++ vs ada results)
Message-ID: <1991Jun23.032353.8718@netcom.COM>
Date: 23 Jun 91 03:23:53 GMT
References: <1991Jun18.122812.18190@eua.ericsson.se> <1991Jun18.220609.19103@netcom.COM> <1991Jun19.170047.25064@software.org> <1991Jun20.143535.27176@software.org> <25587@well.sf.ca.us>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest}
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>     Real chief programmer teams are very rare. I've never heard of one
>other than in Brooks' book.

Given your description below, I don't find this surprising, since I
find it impossible. Read on.

>It's organized like a surgical team.  The chief
>programmer personally writes most of the delivered code, and everything else
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>is set up to facilitate this.

Tommyrot! How on earth is a single human being going to write "most",
or, for that matter, even a FRACTION, of the code on a project of
significant size? I'm talking here of things like the multi-MILLION
line FAA rewrite of the U.S. air traffic control system. No, what is
needed is a single architect (or at least a very small number of
architects on a tightly focused team) who set up the groundrules for
the overall system. After that, a horde of implementors can hammer
out the individual subsystems.

What you describe sounds like something that MIGHT work, but only on
a programming-in-the-small project, which I'm not particularly interested
in (I view programming-in-the-small as a solved problem).

>    It's too much of a culture shock for most organization.

As would be any unworkable scheme. ;-)
-- 
*** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 ****
*Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects*
*of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/*
*reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++.    *