From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!east.pima.edu!rharwood Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada mandates for European Community, NATO, NASA Message-ID: <1991Jun2.213842.1@east.pima.edu> From: rharwood@east.pima.edu Date: 2 Jun 91 21:38:42 MST List-Id: A recent advertisement for an Ada compiler stated: "Ada's the law for all Department of Defense, NASA, and NATO related programming. Overseas, Ada's the law for all European Community programming." I am aware of Public Law requiring DOD work in Ada. Is anyone aware of approved legislation/regulation REQUIRING Ada in the other named environments? I'm not disputing their claims... in fact, I'm writing an article attempting to claim that every software developer ought to be familiar with Ada, because of its increasing commercial and international use. Any specific information beyond the June 1, 1991 DoD mandate and the Air Force policy letter would be appreciated, ESPECIALLY from our European Ada users! Thanks in advance! Ray ----- Ray Harwood |Data Basix |Associate Faculty, Voice: (602)721-1988 |PO Box 18324 | Pima Community College FAX: (602)721-7240 |Tucson, AZ 85731 USA |Instructor in Ada and Pascal CompuServe: 76645,1370|AppleLink: DATA.BASIX|Internet: rharwood@east.pima.edu