From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!jls
From: jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: vs Ada - Don't forget the prime directive!
Message-ID: <1991Jun19.184403.9290@netcom.COM>
Date: 19 Jun 91 18:44:03 GMT
References: <9106151802.AA16989@zach.fit.edu> <311@trwacs.UUCP> <1991Jun19.151041.23487@software.org>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest}
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>In article <311@trwacs.UUCP> erwin@trwacs.UUCP (Harry Erwin) writes:
>> Barry Boehm has noted, however, that there are major types
>> of software that Ada is very poor at implementing
>> [others in list deleted] test generation code

Actually, while I was at Rational we wrote a tool that runs over the
DIANA tree for a unit and automatically generates a unit test for that
unit. Works great. Or doesn't this count for some reason?
-- 
*** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 ****
*Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects*
*of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/*
*reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++.    *