From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:5719 comp.lang.c++:14217
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!aplcomm!uunet!odi!dlw
From: dlw@odi.com (Dan Weinreb)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: c++ vs ada results
Message-ID: <1991Jun19.150134.15262@odi.com>
Date: 19 Jun 91 15:01:34 GMT
References: <1991Jun12.164741.412@news.larc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <1991Jun16.041037.11606@kithrup.COM> <1991Jun18.041751.3740@netcom.COM> <1991Jun18.122812.18190@eua.ericsson.se>
Reply-To: dlw@odi.com
Organization: Object Design, Inc.
In-Reply-To: euamts@eua.ericsson.se's message of 18 Jun 91 12:28:12 GMT
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1991Jun18.122812.18190@eua.ericsson.se> euamts@eua.ericsson.se (Mats Henricson) writes:

   I have so far only done programming as a library designer, and I think that
   is *VERY* difficult if you try to produce code that is:
   a) fast
   b) not wasting memory
   c) usable
   d) reusable (in terms of subclasses)
   e) etc
   f) etc
   g) etc

Certainly.  But it's difficult in any language.