From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!aplcomm!uunet!weyrich!orville
From: orville@weyrich.UUCP (Orville R. Weyrich)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Use pragma INLINE or not?
Message-ID: <1991Jun19.085804.1813@weyrich.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jun 91 08:58:04 GMT
References: <1991Jun18.171459.11744@software.org>
Reply-To: orville@weyrich.UUCP (Orville R. Weyrich)
Organization: Weyrich Computer Consulting
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1991Jun18.171459.11744@software.org> stluka@neptune.software.org (Fred Stluka) writes:
>About the use of pragma INLINE...
>
>There seem to be 2 schools of thought:
>
>     1)  Don't use it.  Smart compilers will automatically
>         inline the most appropriate routines.
>
>     2)  Use it.  Compilers aren't that smart yet.
>
>What do you think?
>

	3) Use it if you think that you have the time and ability to 
	   do a better job than the compiler of sub-optimizing the code.


--------------------------------------           ******************************
Orville R. Weyrich, Jr., Ph.D.                   Certified Systems Professional
Internet: orville%weyrich@uunet.uu.net             Weyrich Computer Consulting
Voice:    (602) 391-0821                         POB 5782, Scottsdale, AZ 85261
Fax:      (602) 391-0023                              (Yes! I'm available)
--------------------------------------           ******************************