From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 6 Jul 91 05:36:41 GMT
From: netcomsv!jls@apple.com  (Jim Showalter)
Subject: Re: USE clauses (was: c++ vs ada results)
Message-ID: <1991Jul6.053641.12004@netcom.COM>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Chuck Shotton describes some problems he has had using the Rational
toolset, and argues that for certain kinds of tasks the Rational is
not the right choice.

Could be.

All I know is that in the four years I worked at Rational I kept
encountering developers, CM people, documentation folks, toolsmiths,
managers, etc who said, in one phrasing or another, "We couldn't have
completed this project without Rational's technology.".
-- 
*** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 ****
*Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects*
*of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/*
*reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++.    *