From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 4 Jul 91 14:49:50 GMT
From: csusac!cindy!rreid@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu  (Ralph Reid III)
Subject: Re: chief programmer team organizations was (c++ vs ada results)
Message-ID: <1991Jul04.144950.1570@ecst.csuchico.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <73164@microsoft.UUCP> jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) writes:
>. . .
>Please use comp.object or some other neutral forum to "discuss" the
>"relative advantages" of various programming languages.
>
>Please leave individual language forums such as comp.lang.c++ or
>comp.lang.ada open for people to ask questions about their individual
>languages and hopefully receive answers.
>
>Some of us have been reading comp.lang.c++ and/or comp.lang.ada and/or
>comp.lang.xyz for several years now, and have read literally dozens 
>of these inter-language "comparisons."  We have heard many of the same 
>"comparisons" made between the many of the same languages many times over.
>The only result has been that some of the most experienced programmers
>refuse to read or contribute to their particular language groups anymore,
>finding them too much of a waste of time.
>
>. . .

Yeah!  Some one wanna start a comp.lang.comp group?

-- 
Ralph.  N6BNO.
Compuserve - 72250.3521@compuserve.com.  Phone 1-916-345-9155.
lectromail- rreid@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu.
I do not waste time expressing others' opinions!