From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!sicsun!disuns2!elcgl.epfl.ch!madmats
From: madmats@elcgl.epfl.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: free ADA compiler
Message-ID: <1991Jan11.180140.1@elcgl.epfl.ch>
Date: 11 Jan 91 17:01:40 GMT
References: <"22-Dec-90.12:54:14.EST".*.Martin_A_Leisner.wbst139@Xerox.com> <1991Jan6.135259.1@capd.jhuapl.edu>
Sender: news@disuns2.epfl.ch
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1991Jan6.135259.1@capd.jhuapl.edu>, waltrip@capd.jhuapl.edu writes:
>       A free compiler might be worth 
> 	considering.
> 
I can only say that I fully agree, especially if an aproach like 
the one taken for gcc is followed.

Mats