From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!planck!corsair!westley From: westley@corsair.uucp (Terry J. Westley) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C and assembler crashing the machine Summary: Ada, too Message-ID: <1990Mar19.183905.17393@planck.uucp> Date: 19 Mar 90 18:39:05 GMT References: <90076.002500CMH117@psuvm.psu.edu> Sender: news@planck.uucp (Usenet News) Reply-To: westley%hercules@planck.UUCP (Terry J. Westley) Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Organization: Calspan Corporation ATC Buffalo, NY List-Id: In article <90076.002500CMH117@psuvm.psu.edu> CMH117@psuvm.psu.edu (Charles Hannum) writes: ...[stuff deleted] >I have used, do use, and will continue to use C. Just because some people >have just recently discovered that "YES!, you CAN crash your machine with a C >program!" is not enough to make ME stop using it. ...[more stuff deleted] >Besides, I write some fairly useful software in C, and also in assembler. And >I'm not going to stop writing in assembly language simply because "YES!, you >can crash your machine with an assembly language program!", either. > Anyone who thinks that Ada prevents stupid mistakes or will prevent crashing the machine or will make all code easy to read and understand does not know Ada well. The real question is: who should we let know about this? :-) Terry J. Westley Arvin/Calspan Advanced Technology Center P.O. Box 400, Buffalo, NY 14225 acsu.buffalo.edu!planck!hercules!westley