From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uccba!spca6!icc!cbp From: cbp@icc.com (Chris Preston) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C++ to Ada? Message-ID: <1990Jan10.011741.7318@icc.com> Date: 10 Jan 90 01:17:41 GMT References: <24389@gryphon.COM> Reply-To: cbp@kirk.UUCP (Chris Preston) Organization: Intercomputer Communications Corp. List-Id: In article <24389@gryphon.COM> bagpiper@pnet02.gryphon.com (Michael Hunter) writes: >ted@grebyn.com (Ted Holden) writes: >>From: Bill Wolf, Clemson >> >>> I personally would consider the use of a C++-to-Ada preprocessor for >>> the development of new code to be entirely out of the spirit of Ada. >> >>Why are you and your friends even considering such a thing, Bill? >>Having problems with Ada again? I mean, I'm not sitting here >I actually take offense to that also. A bad Ada programmer is a bad c >programm (oh, and ted, it is c and C++...not C and C++) is a bad C++ program ^^^^^^^^^^^ Why does K&R (Second Edition) use "C" throughout the entire book? cbp PS: Isn't it "Ted" rather than "ted" ? :-) -- cbp