From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2729 comp.sw.components:304
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucla-cs!uci-ics!rfg
From: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ronald Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.sw.components
Subject: Re: Translating 83 => 9X (Was: Re: Ada 9X objectives)
Message-ID: <1989Oct7.012729.3516@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Date: 7 Oct 89 01:27:29 GMT
References: <1989Oct3.200234.25940@paris.ics.uci.edu> <6678@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Sender: news@paris.ics.uci.edu (Network News)
Reply-To: Ronald Guilmette <rfg@ics.uci.edu>
Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <6678@hubcap.clemson.edu> billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
>
>   I do not know as a fact that this is the case, but I do recall
>   reading about plans for automatic 83 => 9X translation.  Perhaps
>   someone having more direct knowledge of the situation could comment
>   in greater detail.

If you can find the reference, I'm sure that many here would be interested
to read that same publication.

// rfg