From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2894 comp.lang.c++:5503 comp.lang.smalltalk:1486 gnu.g++:520
Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!usc!ucla-cs!uci-ics!ics.uci.edu!rfg
From: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,gnu.g++
Subject: HELP!  Need ref's on OO vs. Execution efficiency.
Message-ID: <1989Nov13.163732.28890@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 89 00:37:32 GMT
Reply-To: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette)
Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have commited myself to writing a paper about the effect on
execution efficiency of using Object Oriented Languages (or
perhaps even an OO design approach).

I *must* have references, but there don't seem to be many in the
literature that I have seen so far.  I guess that most OO oriented
people just assume that the benefits of OO far outweigh any possible
loss of efficiency (or that there is no significant loss).

(In fact I recall hearing one anecdote about how a C program was
converted to C++ and the speed *increased* !!)

Anyway, I'm in desparate need of a list of relevant references (which
I must have by Wed. night at the latest).

If you can help me, please E-mail your suggestions for references to:

	rfg@ics.uci.edu

Thanks everybody.

// rfg