From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 11 Sep 91 19:59:57 GMT From: sun-barr!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!newstop!exodus!oogoody.Eng.Sun.COM!root @apple.com (Operator) Subject: Re: Large System Decomposition Message-ID: <19832@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> List-Id: In article <1991Sep10.220036.20777@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> haim@taichi.UUCP (2 4122-Haim Kilov) writes: >--Don't forget, however, about relationships between managed objects that, >quoting the new draft of ISO standard, are "significant entities, warranting >conceptual attention". This draft attempts to provide formal specification Yes, this is one of the most interesting and novel aspects to me, taking relationships whose bits and pieces are generally scattered about in code and making them a formal thing in and of themselves. Could you elaborate a little on what you've done? It may be useful to consider some concrete examples... >As I had mentioned some time ago, Bellcore Special Report "Information modelin g >concepts and guidelines" discusses some of these issues at some length. How do I go about getting the special report? Sounds interesting.