From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,413f905778ed0a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-05 06:16:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: scallassig@mailexpire.com (Harald Korneliussen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KDevelop 3.0 released - was Ada popularity Date: 5 Feb 2004 06:16:34 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <19401efb.0402050616.48d9236f@posting.google.com> References: <08WdnUMRGICNz73dRVn-jw@comcast.com> <1672064.EiTi3y1jD6@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.38.143.139 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1075990595 26048 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2004 14:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5251 Date: 2004-02-05T06:16:34-08:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote in message news:... > Unfortunately, there is no Ada binding to KDE as of now. Perhaps you > would care to write one? Heh, quite a lot of work. On the other hand, Qt is c++ isn't it? That may permit a binding to be rather thin and still feel reasonably ada-like.