From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.83.11 with SMTP id n11mr3962973itb.48.1516549390247; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:43:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.31.57 with SMTP id x54mr204581otd.1.1516549390020; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:43:10 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g80no1536352itg.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni5401ita.0!nntp.google.com!g80no1536347itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:43:09 -0800 (PST) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.245.160.161; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.160.161 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <193126c2-f171-43ed-8c7c-00570f1dd4d4@googlegroups.com> Subject: making a son benefit access ton an instanciation of a generic package required as a formal parameter to his father and instanciated by him From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:43:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Body-CRC: 96844296 X-Received-Bytes: 1671 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50035 Date: 2018-01-21T07:43:09-08:00 List-Id: A generic package P1 is formal parameter of an other generic package P2. P2= has a (public) son. P1 is instanciated in the public part of P2's specific= ations. How can P1's son been granted access to exceptions declared in P1. = Is it possible without instanciating P1 again ? I'm starting to see how much a generic package generic formal parameter can= behave differently from a normal "with"-ed one, non-generic package.