From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SDL Bindings?
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <1901452062401493492.362014laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
References: <a48f71e4-c23a-4526-b645-2c3d683b333e@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: XfmYAMvNy864cCZfCoyeFg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17218
Date: 2013-09-21T21:59:27+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

<krfkeith@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've done some searches for SDL bindings, however they all seem to be
> somewhat incomplete. Moreover, they all appear to be of the thin variety.
> How involved would writing a set of thick bindings for SDL be?

I've bee n thinking about doing this again for a while so I started binding
SDL 2.0 yesterday. It'll be a variable thickness binding.

Luke