From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,735c710b5e547bad
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.180.105.38 with SMTP id gj6mr1291452wib.0.1343313018539;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ge7ni75568486wib.0!nntp.google.com!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 puzzle
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:03:31 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <18usgh1w2ngg.18qc1w5q89um4.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <1arp60wtxes8h$.1qs6bt732ztgp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <030cde76-7435-405d-9f12-ac7f730ecab8@googlegroups.com>
 <1f9q6vk5z2r3t$.1hayo9rmxfwu7$.dlg@40tude.net> <ju8atj$734$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <7308644e-bfbe-44c1-8359-d67392d483e1@googlegroups.com>
 <juaghb$fv9$1@munin.nbi.dk> <1dgc6c6mortfo$.sdphq83df7gu$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.whs3tsvzka8ora@aspire.local>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-07-21T21:03:31+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:21:18 +0400, Vasiliy Molostov wrote:

> Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> �����(�) � ����� ������ Fri,  
> 20 Jul 2012 11:30:02 +0400:
> 
>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:41:46 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>> Construction is not copying, though copying indeed requires
>> construction.
> 
> ...initialization.

Initialization is more specific than construction. There can be
uninitialized objects. But any accessible object is conceptually
constructed.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de