From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8591be732d0fce98 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!62.111.101.3.MISMATCH!news.germany.com!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada OOP alternatives? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <462e0cf4-1d53-4918-b30b-dd3d8df90f1b@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <487d9636$0$6543$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <6e5uq2F5g7n6U2@mid.individual.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:00:38 +0200 Message-ID: <18maowv5tf52i$.winpalz4hj7p$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Jul 2008 14:00:39 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: ef7f4d6e.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=UDdHOQXSYVjEB;5>eE0T7mMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kFoN`im]3?2NIi X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1192 Date: 2008-07-17T14:00:39+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:28 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote: > So it's clearly feasible to have information in bodies used > when compiling clients. It is feasible, but makes little sense. Why there should be bodies then? What is the property of a body the specification does not have, and reverse? In other words, provided the compiler could not compile specifications without bodies, why the code reader/maintainer should be able to do this? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de