From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,34257fd17abeba14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: [SPARK] Code safety and information hiding
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <ebuj47$bal$1@sunnews.cern.ch> <gFKEg.138542$1i1.49988@attbi_s72>
  <wccoduhy7er.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <rvxFg.142445$1i1.19629@attbi_s72>
  <upsex12ed.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <%%QFg.913090$084.629274@attbi_s22>
 <uu047jkgz.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <IH7Gg.6067$aJ.4037@attbi_s21>
 <ecbn52$ie1$1@sunnews.cern.ch> <2SnGg.6629$aJ.3371@attbi_s21>
 <i413r5sa76uh.1n497rro9sm9l$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <bfpGg.13939$E02.5155@newsb.telia.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:27:11 +0200
Message-ID: <18m8mfcmrr7ab.wt1ka47cez7l.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Aug 2006 09:26:56 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2ee92ac9.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=QO_dX>R\SN9Tia]Ho99G50ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR14nDHegD_]R55:3[lidaC_;DNcfSJ;bb[5FCTGGVUmh?4N\HXHJ4e80>1?:a=[P^Z_<
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6310
Date: 2006-08-22T09:26:56+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:06:15 GMT, Bj�rn Persson wrote:

> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:31:10 GMT, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
>>> Now each main subprogram that was a subprogram (Ada doesn't have 
>>> subroutines) in the original has its own local variables.
>> 
>> Which are global relatively to the process, and local relatively to the
>> distributed system as a whole.
> 
> No. They're declared inside the main subprogram and not visible to any 
> library-level packages, so they aren't truly global.

So "truly global" = library level?

What about a program P1 invoking compiler on P2, linking and executing the
result? Are library things of P2 truly global?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de