From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:31:09 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <18jneq8stp0h.95zrzy7hafft$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com> <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: AuYlnUSfTZrfhAkRjyySpQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20202 Date: 2014-06-10T18:31:09+02:00 List-Id: On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:33:07 -0700 (PDT), Lucretia wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 15:43:04 UTC+1, Brad Moore wrote: > >> Is there a list of such libraries that would be of interest? If that is >> what is stopping people from using Ada, then I would think it wouldn't >> be too hard to find people willing to work on creating non-GPL versions >> of such libraries, or to create bindings to other libraries that already >> exist. At the very least it would be a lot easier than inventing a new >> language, and then creating versions of those libraries in that new >> language. > > If you really need a list, go to AdaCore's libre site, they're all GPL, > and all a problem due to that. That is not an answer. I am using nothing from that site, except for GtkAda. The company I am working in also uses nothing. If you have concrete things in mind, I am sure people here will be glad to point you closed source friendly alternatives. ----------------- One of Ada problems that people simply do not ask or else ask for kind of cosmic-sized things, unbelievable for a small start-up. Presently, I'd claim, Ada lacks nothing substantial at the library side. Few missing things, you mentioned XML parser (why anybody would need an atomic hand grenade?), could be done in a weak or so with existing tools. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de