From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3222ec528646b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-25 21:49:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.airnews.net!cabal12.airnews.net!usenet From: "John R. Strohm" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Enforcing good software process Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:15:20 -0500 Organization: Airnews.net! at Internet America Message-ID: <18CAFECC8191AA43.5AEFBE8E99D3F534.A23FE22EA2EB6297@lp.airnews.net> X-Orig-Message-ID: References: Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net NNTP-Posting-Time: Fri Apr 25 23:45:40 2003 NNTP-Posting-Host: !`Bm]1k-X5P%F"8 (Encoded at Airnews!) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36594 Date: 2003-04-25T15:15:20-05:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:uu1cmfw37.fsf_-_@nasa.gov... > I'd much prefer CMM level 3 or above, independent of language. The only difference between CMM level 2 and CMM level 3 is this: At CMM level 2, every project at a company is using *A* defined, published process. At CMM level 3, they are all using the *SAME* defined, published process. > ISO 9000 would also be a comfort, but less so (I've seen really bad > code from ISO 9000 certified shops). ISO 9000 says nothing about quality. It just says that they have written down their process, they are following their written process, and independent auditors have spot-checked them on it.