From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!umace03
From: umace03@doc.ic.ac.uk (M Y Ben Gershon)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Enumeration_IO
Message-ID: <1874@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 9 May 90 22:36:51 GMT
References: <1846@sparko.gwu.edu> <1117@software.software.org> <1850@sparko.gwu.edu>
Sender: news@doc.ic.ac.uk
Reply-To: umace03@doc.ic.ac.uk (M Y Ben Gershon)
Organization: Imperial College Department of Computing
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>In article <1850@sparko.gwu.edu> mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Mike Feldman) writes:

>  Change
>    > COLOR_IO.PUT(ITEM => C, SET => LOWER_CASE);
>  to
>      COLOR_IO.PUT(ITEM => C, SET => TEXT_IO.LOWER_CASE);
>                                     ^^^^^^^^

Yes, OK.  But why doesn't COLOR_IO.LOWER_CASE work, seeing that we are using

package COLOR_IO is new TEXT_IO.ENUMERATION_IO(ENUM => COLORS);

shouldn't it follow that LOWER_CASE is distinct for each separate instantiation
of TEXT_IO.<enum_type> ?  Yet, if I put COLOR_IO.LOWER_CASE it doesn't work,
giving the same error message as before.

Michael Ben-Gershon
umace03@doc.ic.ac.uk