From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!decuac!shlump.nac.dec.com!ashok.dec.com!nadkarni
From: nadkarni@ashok.dec.com (Ashok P. Nadkarni)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaZ Validation?
Message-ID: <18443@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Date: 21 Dec 90 19:40:09 GMT
Sender: newsdaemon@shlump.nac.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <1990Dec21.132834.3779@ims.alaska.edu>, ftpam1@acad3.alaska.edu (MUNTS PHILLIP A) writes...
>     You won't want to use AdaZ for production anyway.

Why not ? I'm thinking of buying this compiler for serious use (not just a
learning tool). Is there something I should be aware of :-?

/Ashok Nadkarni