From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Luke A. Guest Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Status of SDLAda Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:01:15 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <1836987127.495410150.367894.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> References: <579554615.495335357.185457.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <1736075160.495335426.356316.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: J7MbjkvV0a1cym7LWSpfrQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPhone/iPod Touch) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:pGBa5WZFQmaMrlb4v1z/TiKcaus= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31760 Date: 2016-09-12T23:01:15+01:00 List-Id: Michael B. wrote: > On 09/12/16 03:12, Luke A. Guest wrote: >>> Yes I will. Just been in Linux driver land messing with Radv and Vulkan for >>> Gentoo. > > I'm glad to hear that :-) > >> The next thing I intend to work on is the event system because I don't like >> what I have. > > In my tests it worked pretty well. What's wrong with it? It's a bit too thin and chucks up warnings when converting between different events. A thick binding would allow use of the type system. I just need to create a test branch as I'm not sure if the performance implications. >> Also I need to add more texture iterators and then images have to have >> similar. > > I wanted to use this binding to do some 2D gaming experiments. Therefore > I need to create surfaces/textures from image files, but this part seems > not to be finished yet. > Would you accept contributions to your binding? I was thinking of > writing something for SDL_surface.h and/or SDL_image.h which implies a > binding for SDL_rwops.h. Yeah I haven't got around to that yet. I've been meaning on looking into copyright issues as I don't want this biting me at a later date. I'm happy to accept contributions as long as they stick to the same kind of interface, thin where need be thick when required, stick to the Ada style and agrees to copyright assignment which can be done in a hit pull /patch.