From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,865386f3ea1dd9f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Ada] implement many new Ada 2005 features Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:08:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1832598.i91PY2bdjx@jellix.jlfencey.com> References: <1ZqdnRrgeMe3Br7fRVn-qg@megapath.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net n9g/HkiSTsfVfwzy9xuqwgVPKwTkKNB39x/FwF7ThKXdU4ZHmt X-Phone: +41 62 961 13 52 X-Mood: Another fscking Monday. What do you expect? Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8557 Date: 2005-03-01T09:08:28+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote: >> Real-time, yes. Hard real-time, I don't think so. > Of course with today's CPUs some things that used to be difficult to > do in real time are now easy. (note Java) Still doesn't qualify for "hard real-time". The notion of "immortal memory" and no heap realtime threads" didn't go into the RTSJ just for fun. Vinzent. -- worst case: The wrong assumption there actually is one.