From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Mike Feldman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: On quitting an Iterator Prematurely Keywords: Modeling Message-ID: <1823@sparko.gwu.edu> Date: 1 May 90 16:09:37 GMT References: <9004262133.AA06607@hac2arpa.hac.com> <7050@fy.sei.cmu.edu> Reply-To: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu () Organization: The George Washington University, Washington D.C. List-Id: In article <7050@fy.sei.cmu.edu> rsd@sei.cmu.edu (Richard S D'Ippolito) writes: > >(*) Yes, you can define one as an ADT, and at least one inplementation of >Pascal has the first as successor to last, but this means the bar is now the >exception! Isn't it better to aviod philosophical arguments as to which is >fundamental, more useful, or prevalent, and define them both as natural >components? This is a nice idea. Does anyone know if there was an Ada9x suggestion to provide this? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Michael Feldman Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science The George Washington University Washington, DC 20052 +1-202-994-5253 mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------