From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fce663eaf40b52f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Manifesto against Vector
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 08:40:57 +0200
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <1821028.OQ5phai688@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <mailman.63.1083641204.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <feQlc.6993$V97.2116@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <mailman.68.1083695056.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <bebbba07.0405042128.1a322885@posting.google.com>
 <c7b8oa$o6v$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0405051942.59af7456@posting.google.com> <e8oc7c.itd.ln@skymaster>
 <na0k90h8oii6063v7n6u5mmib5v20b2emh@4ax.com>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1083919107 04 7163 y+f0GxBlwoWVS6pA 040507 08:38:27
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: r2hLG-ZHYepMh68Y7ACtMpy+pOBUvdcueb0WA87IpeNNBGqNT1F66N
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7
Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:354
Date: 2004-05-07T08:40:57+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry wrote:

> This might work with bodies, but it does not with specifications. What
> would you do with:
> 
> with Foo;
> procedure P (<something here needs visibility of Foo>);

You can always use "Foo.<something>". Remember: specifications need to
double for documentation. Any user who whiches do use procedure P need to
know from which unit <something> comes from as well.

I, for example I use "use" in specifications not before "private". 

>>Allowing with/use would simply encourage a style that should be
>>discouraged altogether. QED.
 
> Oh, Use is Use, and With is With, and never the twain shall meet, ...
> (:-))

More importantly use "use" sparsly.

With Regards

Martin
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com