From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,da38106463609bde X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!atl-c08.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!ALLTEL.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:48:04 -0500 From: "Marc A. Criley" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and multi-core CPUs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <181be$4325a337$49950f5$23729@ALLTEL.NET> X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Organization: UseNetServer.com X-Trace: 181be4325a337a13cf55023729 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4588 Date: 2005-09-12T10:48:04-05:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote: > I finally got around to testing a sort. I split the data array in half, > sorting one half with the main program and the other with a separate task, > then merged the two half-results. It's substantially (about 60% as long > for 100K floats) faster than splitting, sort one half, then the other > half, then merge. And easy to program in Ada. Write it up and submit for publication. Chip Multi-Processing (multi-core CPUs) seems to be a hot technical issue; it was the theme of the latest (9/05) issue of ACM Queue. -- Marc A. Criley -- McKae Technologies -- www.mckae.com -- DTraq - XPath In Ada - XML EZ Out