From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fce663eaf40b52f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Manifesto against Vector
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 08:33:00 +0200
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <1805948.kOkelemZ3r@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <mailman.63.1083641204.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <feQlc.6993$V97.2116@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <mailman.68.1083695056.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <bebbba07.0405042128.1a322885@posting.google.com>
 <c7b8oa$o6v$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0405051942.59af7456@posting.google.com> <e8oc7c.itd.ln@skymaster>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1083919106 04 7163 y+f0GxBlKoNsSbHC 040507 08:38:26
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: GFPfAkZBoeixw0yIB5x1o-uZbIxv224qinGZXvzKVptujdtm6IpdcY
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7
Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:352
Date: 2004-05-07T08:33:00+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:

> 
> "Russ" <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> a �crit dans le message de
> [...]
>> That may be so, but this particular issue is simple enough even for an
>> ameteur like me. I know that
>>
>> with/use Ada.Integer_Text_IO;
>>
>> is cleaner and simpler than
>>
>> with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Inteqer_Text_IO
>>
>> And I also that it is a trivial matter to parse the former to produce
>> the latter. I could do it myself in a few minutes. Nor does it break
>> compatibility with legacy code in any way. I see absolutely no
>> reasonable objection to "with/use" (but I have a funny feeling that I
>> may soon be bombarded with a lot of unreasonable objections).

> Therefore, you should *never* have a use clause as a context clause. If I
> need to have something visible everywhere in a unit, I use the same style
> as when the visibility is more restricted, i.e. I don't write:
> 
> with Foo; use Foo;
> procedure P is
> ...
> end P;
> 
> but rather:
> 
> with Foo;
> procedure P is
>    use Foo;
>    ...
> end P.

And he is not the only one. I doing it just same way.
 
> Allowing with/use would simply encourage a style that should be
> discouraged altogether. QED.

Right.

With Regards

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com