From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.24.135 with SMTP id u7mr626472wif.3.1345237763507;
        Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q11ni181662179wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.138.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!217.153.128.51.MISMATCH!nf1.ipartners.pl!ipartners.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit0.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:53:30 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wiml9rw3ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wim0pbprka8ora@aspire.local>
 <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <k01amo$jio$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com>
 <k04a26$doi$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wius1gdbka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0bubm$loe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com>
 <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <k0ei0u$214$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-15T20:53:30+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:53:09 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 15.08.12 18:24, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:49:01 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>> 
>>> On 15.08.12 13:55, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:37 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would say that a network connecting the electrical devices
>>>>> of a car does not counts as heterogeneous.
>>>>
>>>> How are the ECU, navigation system, ABS, windshield wiper homogenous?
>>>
>>> They are homogeneous in that the 4 suppliers agree to be supplying
>>> for the same 1 system, under the "umbrella-notion" of car
>>> electronics.
>> 
>> I see, not to forget that the gravitational constant is same too. That
>> evidently makes it homogenous...
> 
> Dropping the blinders will make you see how people decide
> which data format is adequate under the respective circumstances.
> 
> I have tried to supply hooks for formalization of these
> situational variables. Apply fuzzy logic.

Formal by which measure? And how does it make car's devices homogenous? And
how these false premises could justify any application of XML even if per
some miracle they happened true?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de