From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,775f2cb8854e78a2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-28 06:17:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: amado.alves@netcabo.pt (M?rio Amado Alves) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SVG to PNG [was: Ada_Arrays Project] Date: 28 Nov 2003 06:17:13 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <17eddf9f.0311280617.2a547540@posting.google.com> References: <17eddf9f.0311270408.53a25eb1@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.137.36.167 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1070029033 16703 127.0.0.1 (28 Nov 2003 14:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3028 Date: 2003-11-28T06:17:13-08:00 List-Id: > > I'm entertaining the idea of a generic package Ada_Arrays and children > > where Ada_Arrays is like Ada.Strings except the element type is > > generic instead of Character. > > > > Anybody besides me foresees the great usefulness of Ada_Arrays? > > Anybody did it? > > I think it's the sort of thing that has been done before by lots of people, > generally not in a very organised or uniform way. I would guess the biggest > problem would be that people would be reluctant to pay for this sort of > thing; they would think "Crikey, I could just as easily write that myself," > even if they actually were wrong. I would be willing to pay--under the referenced conditions.