From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,92c1feaa4de35d57,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-08 05:42:39 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: amado.alves@netcabo.pt (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1rio_Amado_Alves?=)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Bases 1 : size matters
Date: 8 Sep 2003 05:42:37 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <17eddf9f.0309080442.7b27f0e4@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.113.164.98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1063024958 21886 127.0.0.1 (8 Sep 2003 12:42:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Sep 2003 12:42:38 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42272
Date: 2003-09-08T12:42:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

(Sorry if you get this twice.)

I'm planning to include the requirement (in Bases 2) that the package 
spec for each container type should be small, say one page long.

In the excelent school (FCTUNL) where I was introduced to Ada they 
also had this rule.

Message addendum for CLA:

In the ASCLWG list a number of comments were filed for Bases 1, as
proposed in the Work plan. Soon Bases 2 will be released integrating
these as well as maybe the aforesaid requirement for small specs.

(Although the ASCLWG is the proposed forum to post comments to the
Bases list, CLA is a channel of choice for important notices, so
sometimes a comment is relayed here.)