From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1a99299e465c053
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Erroneous results with LOG function when using inline option
 (-gnatN)
Date: 4 Aug 2004 05:46:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <17cd177c.0408040446.5916eb64@posting.google.com>
References: <9c9fb8b4.0408030820.720a57cb@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.173.163.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091623618 6603 127.0.0.1 (4 Aug 2004 12:46:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2531
Date: 2004-08-04T05:46:57-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Fr�d�ric Ormancey:

> Hello,
> 
> When compiling a simple program using Log function, instance from
> Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions, I had an erroneous result
> when using -gnatN option ( INLINE ).

I had the same problem with GNAT 3.15p for Win32 (tested on Win 9x
and Win 2K/XP), that for the Sqrt function: result 0. I sent a bug report
to report (_at_) gnat_._com and the reply was that this is a compiler
bug, corrected in more recent versions. So I just wouldn't use
-gnatN with GNAT 3.15p. NB: -gnatn is working fine.

HTH
________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!