From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-07 22:14:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier) Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died) Date: 7 May 2003 22:14:21 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <17cd177c.0305072114.24f04783@posting.google.com> References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304240950.45114a39@posting.google.com> <4a885870.0304291909.300765f@posting.google.com> <416273D61ACF7FEF.82C1D1AC17296926.FF0BFD4934A03813@lp.airnews.net> <9fa75d42.0305010621.55e99deb@posting.google.com> <254c16a.0305011035.13133e8d@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305011727.5eae0222@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.95.176 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1052370862 23426 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2003 05:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2003 05:14:22 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63285 comp.object:62957 comp.lang.ada:37053 misc.misc:14008 Date: 2003-05-08T05:14:22+00:00 List-Id: softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng): [Ada attributes] > Yes, Ada extended Pascal very strongly in this regards, > without any particular consideration of how useful > these extensions would actually turn out to be. [other Ada attributes] > Like I said, Ada has amazing amounts of itsy-bitsy stuff. > Now which of these features, if missing, would take you > more than a minor effort to provide yourself? If and > when necessary, rather than present by default all the time? If I had to reproduce them each time I use them, it would sum up to a lot of time... and there are more interesting to do in life than reprogramming them. No, you are right. Back to the roots. Hey, there are more. Are these fluffy gadgets like the "for" or "while" loops really useful ? Of course not, it is better with IF's good ol' GOTO's. And these "case", "else". For novice youngsters who didn't even see a true punched card. They should use their "hard drives" only for downloading music or so what. Long life to PDP-11 ! ________________________________________________________ Gautier -- http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!