From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f297d5b850ee1e61
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-04 03:02:50 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Newbie: display control
Date: 4 Mar 2003 03:02:50 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <17cd177c.0303040302.2f0360a8@posting.google.com>
References: <87f5a614.0303011527.4cb09de2@posting.google.com>
 <17cd177c.0303020211.7097abb@posting.google.com>
 <G+Y7JF8ue$Xq@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.173.163.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1046775770 20624 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2003 11:02:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Mar 2003 11:02:50 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34847
Date: 2003-03-04T11:02:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

["normal" command line window in 2003]

Larry Kilgallen:

> That certainly depends on what you mean by "normal".  When I must use
> a machine like Microsoft Windows* or Macintosh that does not come with
> a terminal emulator, I buy a terminal emulator product for it.
> 
> On VMS workstations, a terminal emulator comes as part of the DECwindows
> Motif software.
> 
> "Command line window", I presume describes Microsoft systems.  Doesn't
> Unix do better ?

And VMS even better!
Well, a command line window (a representation of standard_output where
you can buffer thousands of lines) is no terminal emulator (a rectangle
text area). If you want a terminal emulator on today's graphics systems,
of course you can find one. The NT/2K/XP command line window turns into
a DOS screen without problem and I'm using Volkov Commander or
other DOS programs with pleasure. There all Ada bindings you want to
terminals (and emulators).

My point is that fortunately the Ada standard did *not* get trapped into
this (even, any ?) time-limited and system-dependent technology.
________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!